ReviewCureus2026
Physical Activity, Exercise, and Rehabilitation in Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myasthenia gravis causes fluctuating, fatigable weakness, creating uncertainty about physical activity and exercise. This systematic review examined habitual physical activity and sedentary behaviour, barriers and facilitators to exercise, structured exercise, respiratory muscle training, and physical rehabilitation in autoimmune myasthenia gravis. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched from inception to 30 July 2026, without database date or language filters; backward citation searching was completed on 1 August 2026. Primary human studies published in English were eligible if they reported a relevant measure of physical activity, a defined physical intervention, or barriers, facilitators, or professional advice as an explicit primary focus. We included randomized trials, non-randomized intervention studies, observational and qualitative studies, and case series of at least two participants. Multiple reports from the same cohort or trial were linked before synthesis. Risk of bias was assessed with tools appropriate to each design, and certainty was rated by outcome domain. Of 2,767 database records imported into EndNote (Clarivate, Philadelphia, PA), 1,946 remained after deduplication. Across database and citation searching, 66 reports were assessed in full, and 47 reports representing 38 study units (whole studies or distinct study components) were included. In several observational datasets, greater activity was associated with less fatigue or lower disease burden; however, most analyses were cross-sectional and vulnerable to confounding and reverse causality. Intervention studies were small and heterogeneous. Some secondary outcomes and results measured after treatment favoured the intervention for respiratory muscle performance, functional capacity, strength, or patient-reported outcomes, and some measures improved within groups; however, several controlled primary outcomes were null. Evidence from perioperative care, recovery after crisis or hospitalization, and paediatric populations addressed distinct clinical contexts and was not generalized to stable community-dwelling adults. Some selected cohorts achieved high completion or attendance, but reporting of adverse events was incomplete, and certainty about safety was very low. Individually adapted activity and exercise appeared feasible for many selected participants with clinically stable, predominantly mild-to-moderate disease. However, efficacy remains very uncertain, and safety has not been established across the broader myasthenia gravis population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.