Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42763675›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026

Social Accountability in Medical Student Scholarly Projects: A Call for Intentional Integration.

Nikita Jaiswal, Amy Clithero-Eridon, Katherine T Travis, Dalton Kay Smith, Kerri Z Delaney, Erin Cameron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nikita JaiswalUniversity of New Mexico School of Medicine, UNM, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Amy Clithero-EridonFamily & Community Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, UNM, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1652-3725
Katherine T TravisUniversity of New Mexico School of Medicine, UNM, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-9417-712X
Dalton Kay SmithUniversity of New Mexico School of Medicine, UNM, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-0009-0141
Kerri Z DelaneyThe Dr. Gilles Arcand Centre for Health Equity, The Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3937-3317
Erin CameronThe Dr. Gilles Arcand Centre for Health Equity, The Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3529-9247

Funding

Southwest Center for Advancing Clinical and Translational Innovation (SW CACTI)UM1TR005466 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Nancy Pandhi, SALLY RADOVICK · 2025 to 2026
$11.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR005466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While social accountability is integrated into clinical training at many institutions, its role in medical scholarly projects remains unexplored. While much has been studied on social accountability in medical education and service, little is known about how it is approached in research. Therefore, we examined whether community partnerships were included in student plans, the community's role in the research process, and health equity outcomes as measures of social accountability. Methods: We approached this observational study in two stages. In stage 1, we reviewed medical student research proposals. In stage 2, students self-identified where their projects fell on a social accountability spectrum. Results: In stage 1, we reviewed all 75 proposals submitted by the graduating class of 2025, which revealed that most student project plans lacked community involvement and that most scholarly work did not contribute to improving health equity or was not expected to. We determined that 84% (N = 63) of medical scholarly work fell outside the realm of social accountability. Fifty-seven students (N=57 of 414 total students, 14%) responded to the voluntary survey in Stage 2, recruited via a QR code embedded in the mandatory final project form. There was a shift in project self-classification after definitions of social responsiveness, social responsibility, and social accountability were provided. Respondents identified strategies to enhance accountability; however, the majority did not plan to implement these changes. Conclusion: Most scholarly projects by medical students reviewed lacked meaningful community engagement and measurable contributions to health equity. Students demonstrated improved understanding of social accountability when definitions were explicitly provided, yet the majority did not plan to act on identified strategies. These findings reveal a critical gap between institutional commitment to social accountability and its integration into student research, underscoring the need for intentional curricular interventions and structured mentorship in socially accountable research practices.

Indexed as

community engagementmedical studentssocial accountabilityundergraduate research

Identifiers

PMID42763675
PMCPMC13589521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.