ReviewMediastinum (Hong Kong, China)2026
Foregut mediastinal cysts: a narrative review.
Review in Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Foregut mediastinal cysts are rare congenital anomalies arising from aberrant embryonic foregut development, with an estimated incidence of 1 in 42,000 to 1 in 100,000. These benign lesions, including bronchogenic, esophageal duplication, and neurenteric cysts, account for 12-20% of mediastinal masses. They may remain asymptomatic or cause respiratory, gastrointestinal, or neurological symptoms due to compression or complications like infection. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of their embryogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnostic strategies, treatment options, and prognosis to guide clinical decision-making. Methods: A review of the current literature was conducted with a focus on the embryologic origins, histopathologic classification, imaging characteristics, and treatment outcomes of foregut cysts. This narrative review addressed studies describing bronchogenic, esophageal duplication, and neurenteric cysts, with emphasis on diagnostic modalities and management strategies encompassing surgical resection and observation. Key Content and Findings: Bronchogenic cysts, the most common subtype (50-60%), typically occur near the carina, while esophageal duplication and neurenteric cysts are often posterior. Imaging, particularly computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is critical for diagnosis, though histologic confirmation post-resection remains the gold standard. Symptomatic or complicated cysts warrant surgical resection, preferably via minimally invasive techniques like video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS), which offer reduced morbidity. Complete resection yields excellent prognosis, with low recurrence rates, while incomplete resection increases recurrence risk. Conclusions: Foregut mediastinal cysts require precise diagnosis and tailored management. Minimally invasive surgery is the cornerstone for symptomatic or ambiguous cases, ensuring favorable outcomes. Future research should focus on refining imaging techniques and standardizing management protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.