ArticleNeuroscience applied2026
Assessing psychotherapy patients' social context through personal networks and experience sampling: A mixed methods case series exploring feasibility.
Article in Neuroscience applied, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explored the feasibility and perceived clinical utility of a novel psychotherapy intervention consisting of two components (1) assessment of patients' social context using the experience sampling methodology (ESM) and personal social network data collection (PSN) and (2) a feedback report summarizing the collected data. Four qualitatively driven concurrent embedded mixed-methods case studies were conducted in a large mental health care facility in the Netherlands and included nine young adults receiving either individual or group psychotherapy: six in part-time treatment and three transitioning from inpatient to outpatient care. Feasibility and utility were evaluated using codebook thematic analysis of semi-structured patient and therapist interviews, patient compliance with the intervention components and researchers' reflexive field notes. Overall, the intervention appeared most feasible in individual therapy, in which patient and therapist engaged with it collaboratively. Engagement was more difficult among avoidant patients and when the intervention was experienced as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.