ArticleFood science & nutrition2026
Developing an Analytical Framework for the Molecular Weight Analysis of Fish-Derived Collagen Peptides in Beverages: A Multi-Method Comparative Study.
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate determination of the molecular weight of collagen peptides is crucial for quality control in functional beverages. Current national and industry standard methods for peptide powders face challenges of matrix interference and insufficient comparability when applied to complex beverage systems. In this study, three mainstream chromatographic methods were systematically evaluated for their suitability, reproducibility, and consistency in determining the molecular weight (MW) of fish-derived collagen peptides in beverages. An analytical framework was established by identifying and removing interference peaks from non-peptide excipients, followed by systematic comparison of linear and cubic fitting models. All three methods exhibited good reproducibility. After interference peak removal, the peptide profiles of the beverages were highly consistent with those of pure peptide powder. Cubic fitting reduced inter-method differences, with relative standard deviation (RSD) values below 5% in the bioactive < 1 kDa range. The framework was further validated through beverage formulation optimization, demonstrating compatibility between functional ingredient quality control and sensory flavor adjustability. The proposed approach provides a practical solution for industry quality control and cross-laboratory data comparability of collagen peptide beverages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.