ArticleOphthalmology science2026
Nontruncating
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To determine whether mutation class (truncating versus nontruncating) modifies clinical penetrance in heterozygous female carriers of pathogenic Design: Retrospective multicohort pedigree analysis with cluster-aware statistical modeling. Subjects: There are 560 heterozygous female carriers from 126 pedigrees with pathogenic or likely pathogenic Methods: Heterozygous female carriers were classified as affected or unaffected for infantile nystagmus based on clinical examination, and variants were stratified into truncating and nontruncating classes. Penetrance was compared between variant classes using generalized estimating equations with a logistic link and pedigree as the cluster variable. Sensitivity analyses comprised a mixed-effects logistic regression with a pedigree-level random intercept, together with leave-one-pedigree-out and leave-one-publication-out influence diagnostics. Main Outcome Measures: Clinical penetrance of infantile nystagmus, defined as the proportion of heterozygous female carriers meeting clinical criteria, compared between mutation classes. Results: Pooled penetrance was 30.1% (74/246; Wilson 95% confidence interval [CI] 24.7%-36.1%) for truncating variants and 49.7% (156/314; Wilson 95% CI 44.2%-55.2%) for nontruncating variants. Cluster-aware analysis confirmed higher odds of clinical manifestation for nontruncating than truncating variants (odds ratio [OR] 2.12, 95% CI 1.32-3.40, Conclusions: Mutation class is a robust modifier of clinical penetrance in heterozygous female carriers of pathogenic Financial Disclosures: The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.