ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2026
Clinical Characteristics and Timing of Accessory Pathway Reconduction During Catheter Ablation of Accessory Pathways.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Catheter ablation of accessory pathways has high acute success rates; however, accessory pathway (AP) recurrence remains a clinically relevant issue. Although intra-procedural AP reconduction is frequently encountered during ablation procedures, its timing, predictors, and clinical significance remain insufficiently characterized. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the timing, electrophysiologic characteristics, and clinical implications of intra-procedural AP reconduction during catheter ablation of manifest and concealed accessory pathways. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 128 patients with manifest or concealed AP who underwent catheter ablation at our institution between May 28, 2015, and February 2025. Details of cases in which AP reconduction was observed during the 30 min waiting period after successful ablation, including clinical and procedural characteristics, were compared with those of patients without reconduction. Results: Intra-procedural AP reconduction occurred in 23 patients (18.0%). The mean time to reconduction was 16.7 ± 7.0 min, with a maximum interval of 27 min. Compared with patients without reconduction, those with reconduction had a significantly longer time to pathway interruption, more frequent broad or oblique APs, and more complex procedural approaches requiring multiple anatomical access routes. Intra-procedural reconduction was also associated with subsequent late recurrence. Fifteen of 23 events (65.2%) occurred ≥ 15 min after AP elimination. Conclusions: Intra-procedural AP reconduction during catheter ablation of accessory pathways is not uncommon and appears to be associated with specific electrophysiologic and procedural characteristics as well as late recurrence. These findings may facilitate identification of patients at higher risk of reconduction and help guide intra-procedural assessment during catheter ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.