Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42763562›Full record

ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2026

Clinical Characteristics and Timing of Accessory Pathway Reconduction During Catheter Ablation of Accessory Pathways.

Wataru Sasaki, Hitoshi Mori, Daisuke Kawano, Kei Matsumoto, Naomichi Tanaka, Tsukasa Naganuma, Masataka Narita, Kazuhisa Matsumoto, Yoshifumi Ikeda, Takahide Arai and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Wataru SasakiDepartment of Cardiology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Hidaka Saitama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1418-6566
Hitoshi MoriDepartment of Cardiology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Hidaka Saitama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1172-2995
Daisuke KawanoDepartment of Cardiology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Hidaka Saitama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3347-6772
Kei MatsumotoDepartment of Cardiology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Hidaka Saitama Japan.
Naomichi TanakaDepartment of Cardiology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Hidaka Saitama Japan.
Tsukasa NaganumaDepartment of Cardiology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Hidaka Saitama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1133-8367
Masataka NaritaDepartment of Cardiology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Hidaka Saitama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0624-9639
Kazuhisa MatsumotoDepartment of Cardiology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Hidaka Saitama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5648-8135
Yoshifumi IkedaDepartment of Cardiology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Hidaka Saitama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9857-9281
Takahide AraiDepartment of Cardiology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Hidaka Saitama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0890-5688
Shintaro NakanoDepartment of Cardiology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Hidaka Saitama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9104-4786
Ritsushi KatoDepartment of Cardiology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Hidaka Saitama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9989-8708

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Catheter ablation of accessory pathways has high acute success rates; however, accessory pathway (AP) recurrence remains a clinically relevant issue. Although intra-procedural AP reconduction is frequently encountered during ablation procedures, its timing, predictors, and clinical significance remain insufficiently characterized. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the timing, electrophysiologic characteristics, and clinical implications of intra-procedural AP reconduction during catheter ablation of manifest and concealed accessory pathways. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 128 patients with manifest or concealed AP who underwent catheter ablation at our institution between May 28, 2015, and February 2025. Details of cases in which AP reconduction was observed during the 30 min waiting period after successful ablation, including clinical and procedural characteristics, were compared with those of patients without reconduction. Results: Intra-procedural AP reconduction occurred in 23 patients (18.0%). The mean time to reconduction was 16.7 ± 7.0 min, with a maximum interval of 27 min. Compared with patients without reconduction, those with reconduction had a significantly longer time to pathway interruption, more frequent broad or oblique APs, and more complex procedural approaches requiring multiple anatomical access routes. Intra-procedural reconduction was also associated with subsequent late recurrence. Fifteen of 23 events (65.2%) occurred ≥ 15 min after AP elimination. Conclusions: Intra-procedural AP reconduction during catheter ablation of accessory pathways is not uncommon and appears to be associated with specific electrophysiologic and procedural characteristics as well as late recurrence. These findings may facilitate identification of patients at higher risk of reconduction and help guide intra-procedural assessment during catheter ablation.

Indexed as

accessory pathwaycatheter ablationrecurrencesupraventricular tachycardiawaiting periodWPW syndrome

Identifiers

PMID42763562
PMCPMC13589169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.