ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2026
Cathodal tDCS in obsessive-compulsive disorder: cognitive and neurophysiological outcomes in a double-blind sham-controlled trial.
Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This preliminary study examined the efficacy of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in reducing symptom severity, enhancing cognitive flexibility, and modulating brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels in individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Methods: A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial was conducted with 20 patients meeting DSM-V criteria for OCD, of whom 15 completed the intervention and were included in the final analysis. Participants received cathodal mPFC-tDCS (2 mA, 20 min, 10 sessions) or sham stimulation. Symptom severity (Y-BOCS), cognitive flexibility (task-switching), salivary BDNF, and frontal alpha activity (qEEG at Fz) were measured at baseline, post-treatment, and follow-up. Results: The tDCS group exhibited greater reductions in Y-BOCS scores over time ( Conclusions: Cathodal mPFC-tDCS was associated with reduced OCD symptom severity, improved cognitive flexibility, and increased salivary BDNF. These preliminary findings warrant replication in larger controlled samples. Significance: This study extends previous tDCS research in OCD by integrating clinical outcomes with cognitive performance and a peripheral marker of neuroplasticity. It provides preliminary support for mPFC-targeted tDCS as a potential intervention for OCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.