ArticleCurrent psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)2026
Connected and confined: memories of digital experiences in relation to autonomy, competence, and relatedness during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic drove rapid digital transformation and disrupted the ways people could meet their basic psychological needs of autonomy, relatedness and competence. This study explored how people across six European countries (the UK, Poland, Czechia, Germany, Switzerland and Spain) recalled the role of digital technology (DT) in fulfilling these needs. 148 semi-structured interviews were conducted after the pandemic and were analysed using thematic analysis. The analysis showed that DTs were recalled as both supporting and frustrating the satisfaction of all three psychological needs depending on broader material, institutional, social, personal and attitudinal conditions. Accordingly, DTs were associated with conditional autonomy and competence: In participants' accounts, they were linked to experiences of both enhanced and diminished spatial and temporal empowerment and were tied to increased and reduced feelings of competence depending on factors such as time availability, living space, personal views of homeworking, organisational adaptation to digitalisation or external requirements relating to DT use. DT was also recalled in association with relatedness-enhancing experiences of social enrichment and relatedness-frustrating perceptions of disconnection and disengagement as a function of factors such as access to digital tools or cultural and social events, personal experiences such as emotional fatigue and digital norms. These findings contribute to our understanding of how peri-pandemic digital experiences are reconstructed today and point to the persistence of memories that reflect context-dependent interpretations of how digital life shaped need satisfaction. Such memories suggest how psychological well-being during health crises and beyond may be jointly co-constructed by technology and society. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-026-09895-9.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.