Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42763444›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials research2026

Experimental and computational structure study of the commercial NMC622 lithium-ion battery electrode.

Artur Braun, Alexey Rulev, Selma Erat, Murat Aycibin, Eda Uslu, Martin Winter, Sascha Nowak, Markys Cain, Iztok Arcon, Yves Ménesguen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Artur BraunLaboratory for High Performance Ceramics, Empa. Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Überlandstrasse 129, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6992-7774
Alexey RulevLaboratory for High Performance Ceramics, Empa. Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Überlandstrasse 129, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Selma EratLaboratory for High Performance Ceramics, Empa. Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Überlandstrasse 129, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Murat AycibinProgram of Opticianry, Department of Medical Services and Techniques, Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Mersin University, 33340 Mersin, Turkey.
Eda UsluDepartment of Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials, Institute of Science, Mersin University, 33340 Mersin, Turkey.
Martin WinterUniversity of Münster, Münster Electrochemical Energy Technology, MEET, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Sascha NowakUniversity of Münster, Münster Electrochemical Energy Technology, MEET, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Markys CainElectrosciences Ltd., Surrey, UK.
Iztok ArconLaboratory for Quantum Optics, University of Nova Gorica, Vipavska 13, 5000 Nova Gorica, Slovenia.
Yves MénesguenUniversite Paris-Saclay, CEA, LIST, Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel (LNE-LNHB), 91120 Palaiseau, France.
Vladimir PomjakushinLaboratory for Neutron Scattering, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen PSI, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland.
Paul ThompsonUniversity of Liverpool, Oxford St, Liverpool, UK.
Burkhard BeckhoffPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, 10587 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable and traceable characterization of battery electrode materials is essential for standards and harmonized measurements in the growing lithium-ion battery sector. We report a coordinated interfacility study of commercial cathode NMC622, performed within the EURAMET projects OpMetBat and HyMetBat to evaluate reproducibility, uncertainty, and cross-method comparability. A single batch was analyzed using synchrotron X-ray diffraction, high-resolution neutron diffraction at two facilities, transition metal K-edge XANES/EXAFS, DFT-based electronic structure and spectral simulations, and electrochemical measurements. Neutron diffraction yields consistent lattice parameters and transition metal occupancies and enables traceable quantification of lithium content. Lithium loss from neutron refinement agrees with electrochemical charge extraction at low delithiation, whereas deviations at higher states of charge indicate parasitic faradaic processes. XANES and EXAFS confirm local coordination and oxidation states, while DFT reproduces spectral features. Operando impedance correlates with structural evolution and supports state-of-charge metrology. Together, these cross-facility results establish a robust metrological workflow for layered oxide cathode materials. Graphical abstract: Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-026-01938-y.

Indexed as

Crystallographic structureElectronic structureEnergy storageLiOxideX-ray diffraction (XRD)

Identifiers

PMID42763444
PMCPMC13588921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.