ArticleJournal of materials research2026
Experimental and computational structure study of the commercial NMC622 lithium-ion battery electrode.
Article in Journal of materials research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable and traceable characterization of battery electrode materials is essential for standards and harmonized measurements in the growing lithium-ion battery sector. We report a coordinated interfacility study of commercial cathode NMC622, performed within the EURAMET projects OpMetBat and HyMetBat to evaluate reproducibility, uncertainty, and cross-method comparability. A single batch was analyzed using synchrotron X-ray diffraction, high-resolution neutron diffraction at two facilities, transition metal K-edge XANES/EXAFS, DFT-based electronic structure and spectral simulations, and electrochemical measurements. Neutron diffraction yields consistent lattice parameters and transition metal occupancies and enables traceable quantification of lithium content. Lithium loss from neutron refinement agrees with electrochemical charge extraction at low delithiation, whereas deviations at higher states of charge indicate parasitic faradaic processes. XANES and EXAFS confirm local coordination and oxidation states, while DFT reproduces spectral features. Operando impedance correlates with structural evolution and supports state-of-charge metrology. Together, these cross-facility results establish a robust metrological workflow for layered oxide cathode materials. Graphical abstract: Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-026-01938-y.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.