ArticleSystematic reviews2026
Bioconversion of β-carotene to vitamin A across life stages using stable isotope methodologies: a protocol for the systematic review.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVitamin A deficiency (VAD) remains a persistent health concern in the Philippines. Studies using stable isotope methods for assessing β-carotene bioconversion to vitamin A in the vulnerable Filipino population are limited. This review protocol aims to map the global evidence in quantifying β-carotene bioconversion efficiency across diverse population age groups and settings.
methodsFollowing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015, studies published in English between 1 January 2013 and 31 January 2026 will be systematically searched. The databases to be queried include Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, and CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Academic Search Ultimate via the EBSCOhost platform. Citation tracking will also be conducted to identify additional relevant studies. A team of reviewers will conduct a database search, screening, extraction, and procedural analysis. Deduplication will be done using Covidence® software. At least two independent reviewers will perform these tasks. A different reviewer will resolve any conflicts between them. Inclusion criteria are as follows: (a) human participants-apparently healthy or nutritionally at-risk populations, any age group and setting; (b) reporting the use of stable isotope techniques; (c) studies that compare various methodological protocols that use stable isotope techniques and examine the variability of factors across different life stages. Findings will be narratively synthesized in accordance with the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis guidelines, and a descriptive summary will be provided. DISCUSSION: This review focuses on quantifying β-carotene bioconversion efficiency using stable isotopes in diverse populations. The results aim to guide the selection of suitable isotopic methods for assessing intestinal β-carotene bioconversion efficiency in vulnerable populations. This is particularly relevant in resource-limited settings such as the Philippines. Potential limitations of this review as the research team operating within a developing country context include restriction to English-language publications. Also, the anticipated heterogeneity in study designs, isotope methodologies, and outcome measures may limit direct comparability of findings. Nonetheless, the structured synthesis approach is intended to provide a transparent and rigorous overview of the current evidence base and identify priorities for future research. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD420261279500.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.