Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42763379›Full record

ArticleEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2026

Improved operative mortality after esophagectomy in patients aged ≥ 75 years over a decade: a nationwide Japanese retrospective cohort study.

Akihiko Sano, Hideki Endo, Hiroyuki Yamamoto, Yoshihiko Kawaguchi, Tomoki Makino, Kengo Kuriyama, Makoto Sakai, Yasue Kimura, Hiroya Takeuchi, Hideki Ueno and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Akihiko SanoDepartment of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9531-5157
Hideki EndoDepartment of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki YamamotoDepartment of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshihiko KawaguchiProject Management Subcommittee, The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoki MakinoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Kengo KuriyamaDepartment of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan.
Makoto SakaiDepartment of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan.
Yasue KimuraThe Japan Esophageal Society, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroya TakeuchiThe Japan Esophageal Society, Tokyo, Japan.
Hideki UenoDatabase Committee, The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokyo, Japan.
Ken ShirabeDepartment of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan.
Hiroshi SaekiDepartment of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan. h-saeki@gunma-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7243-6960

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEsophagectomy is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly in older patients. Although minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been widely adopted, its contribution to improve operative outcomes in this population remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate temporal trends in short-term outcomes after esophagectomy in patients aged ≥ 75 years and determine whether the increasing adoption of MIS contributed to improved operative mortality.

methodsUsing the Japanese National Clinical Database, we analyzed patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between 2014 and 2024. The primary and secondary endpoints were operative mortality and severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIa), respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed, including sensitivity analyses additionally adjusted for MIS.

resultsAmong 7,678 patients, patient complexity increased over time, with higher proportions of octogenarians, patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status ≥ 3, and patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy. Open thoracotomy decreased from 53.1% to 6.5%, whereas robot-assisted esophagectomy increased from 0% to 34.8%. Operative mortality decreased from 4.7% to 2.4%, with a risk-adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 0.49 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-0.67; P < 0.001). Risk of severe postoperative complications remained unchanged (adjusted OR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.98-1.29; P = 0.11). Mortality reduction remained significant after adjustment for MIS (OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.41-0.83; P = 0.003).

conclusionsDespite increasing patient complexity, operative mortality after esophagectomy in older patients improved substantially over the past decade. This improvement was unlikely to be explained by the increasing use of MIS alone and may reflect broader advances in perioperative management and other system-level factors. These findings have important implications for surgical care in aging populations worldwide.

Indexed as

EsophagectomyFailure-to-rescueMinimally invasive surgeryNational clinical databaseOlder patientsOperative mortality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.