ArticleJournal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine2026
Discretion and Variation in Drug‑Related Federally Assisted Housing Policies Across Public Housing Authorities in Overdose-Impacted Jurisdictions.
Article in Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Public housing authorities (PHAs) apply federal drug-related eligibility and termination criteria but retain discretion in specifying key provisions. We reviewed 36 written policy documents from 19 PHAs serving overdose-impacted metropolitan and micropolitan jurisdictions in 18 states and Washington, D.C. Jurisdictions were selected purposively based on local overdose rates and metropolitan or micropolitan classification. We coded six components spanning eviction and criminal activity lookback periods; definitions of current drug use; termination standards; and whether substance use disorder (SUD) treatment could mitigate exclusions and termination decisions. Criminal activity lookback periods ranged from 18 months to 10 years, and definitions of current drug use and termination criteria varied or were undefined. Most policies permitted SUD treatment as a mitigating factor, but some did not. Variation in written policies within a shared federal framework may contribute to structural barriers to stable housing for people with SUD, with implications for recovery and overdose prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42763353What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.