Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42763353›Full record

ArticleJournal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine2026

Discretion and Variation in Drug‑Related Federally Assisted Housing Policies Across Public Housing Authorities in Overdose-Impacted Jurisdictions.

Michelle L Bedoya, Alene Kennedy-Hendricks

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michelle L BedoyaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 1812 Ashland Avenue, 3rd Floor, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. mbedoya2@jh.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1162-1273
Alene Kennedy-HendricksDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 1812 Ashland Avenue, 3rd Floor, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public housing authorities (PHAs) apply federal drug-related eligibility and termination criteria but retain discretion in specifying key provisions. We reviewed 36 written policy documents from 19 PHAs serving overdose-impacted metropolitan and micropolitan jurisdictions in 18 states and Washington, D.C. Jurisdictions were selected purposively based on local overdose rates and metropolitan or micropolitan classification. We coded six components spanning eviction and criminal activity lookback periods; definitions of current drug use; termination standards; and whether substance use disorder (SUD) treatment could mitigate exclusions and termination decisions. Criminal activity lookback periods ranged from 18 months to 10 years, and definitions of current drug use and termination criteria varied or were undefined. Most policies permitted SUD treatment as a mitigating factor, but some did not. Variation in written policies within a shared federal framework may contribute to structural barriers to stable housing for people with SUD, with implications for recovery and overdose prevention.

Indexed as

health disparitieshousingsocial determinants of healthsubstance use disorderUrban health

Identifiers

PMID42763353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.