ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2026
A dangerous combination: how co-occurring floods and blackouts increase cardiovascular hospitalizations.
Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExtreme weather events (EWEs) are becoming more frequent, but few have assessed the joint effects of floodings and power outages (POs) on health.
objectiveWe aimed to quantify the independent and joint effects of flooding and POs on hospitalizations for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs).
methodsAssociations between flooding/POs and CVD hospitalizations in New York State (NYS) were estimated using distributed lag nonlinear models (DLNMs) within a quasi-Poisson regression framework, adjusting for PM
resultsFlooding and POs were independently associated with total and specific CVDs, but the impact was stronger when they co-occurred (highest RR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.03-1.15). CVD risk increased when flooding persisted for >3 days and when POs exceeded 15.3%. Flooding/POs were associated with longer hospital stays and higher comorbidities. Flooding/PO joint occurrence showed larger risk of CVD hospitalization during COVID-19, although not statistically significant. Stronger joint effects were observed on subtypes of hypertension, stroke, and ischemic heart disease, people over 65 years, those with Medicaid or no insurance coverage, rural residents, and during winter/spring. SIGNIFICANCE: This study highlights the health impacts of co-occurring environmental hazards of flooding and POs, revealing seasonal and temporal patterns and identifying vulnerable subgroups. Targeting susceptible population and deploying preparedness efforts in critical time windows may help mitigate related excess CVD burden. IMPACT: Our study provides new evidence on the impact of co-occurring flooding and POs on CVD hospitalizations. We found that their joint occurring is associated with greater increases in CVD hospitalizations than either exposure alone, disproportionately affecting older adults, socioeconomically vulnerable populations, and rural communities. Distinct seasonal, temporal, and threshold patterns were identified for flooding and POs. These findings offer useful information for emergency management agencies to reduce CVD burden during compound hazard events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42763347What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.