ArticleMolecular psychiatry2026
Targeting the dopaminergic midbrain with precision 7-Tesla biofeedback training in depression: A proof-of-principle randomized controlled trial.
Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The significant heterogeneity of major depressive disorder (MDD) requires the development of interventions that directly target underlying cognitive or neurobiological mechanisms. This work tested the efficacy of self-modulation of the dopaminergic midbrain with high-field 7-Tesla functional MRI biofeedback in a randomized, controlled, proof-of-principle trial that targeted motivation regulation. A total of N = 62 unmedicated participants (MDD and healthy controls) were randomized to receive either Active or Sham 7-Tesla functional MRI biofeedback and completed clinical assessments pre- and up to 30-days post-training. Factor analysis of clinical symptom change revealed a single latent clinical improvement factor that was significantly improved in the Active MDD compared to the Sham MDD group, immediately post-training (β = 15.85, t = 2.31, p = 0.03), and at 24-hours post-training (β = 22.84, t = 2.45, p = 0.02); effects were diminished and no longer significant at 7-day and 30-day follow-ups. Results of specific phenotypic clinical analysis revealed that depressed mood (F = 5.04, p = 0.029) and negative affect (F = 5.21, p = 0.027), but not positive affect, were most improved by the Active biofeedback intervention. Active biofeedback training engaged functional coupling over time between the VTA and the lateral frontal cortex in the MDD group (F = 6.03, p = 0.017), and greater overall VTA regulation was associated with clinical improvement (R = 0.268, p = 0.048). Together, these results indicate the potential utility of dopaminergic midbrain-based biofeedback training for improvement of mood and negative affect in MDD.
Identifiers
42763338What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.