ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Classification of histology and molecular subtypes of brain gliomas and glioneuronal and neuronal tumors using a deep learning approach.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a deep learning classification system for integrated histology and molecular subtyping of gliomas and glioneuronal/neuronal tumors (GNTs). MATERIALS AND
methodsPreoperative multi-parametric MRI data from 1,844 patients with gliomas or GNTs, encompassing T1WI, post-contrast T1WI (T1(+C)), T2Flair, T2WI, and DWI, were analyzed. Subjects were classified into six categories: (1) oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant, and 1p/19q-codeleted; (2) astrocytoma, IDH-mutant; (3) glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype; (4) pilocytic astrocytoma (PA); (5) pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA); and (6) GNTs. A three-level classification system (MRI-G/GNTs) using MobileNetV2 was trained and validated in internal and external datasets. Sequential forward feature selection (SFFS) was utilized to optimize multi-modal network combinations. Furthermore, the MRI-G/GNTs outputs were integrated into structured virtual pathology reports.
resultsThe average Dice for the brain tumor segmentation model was 0.92. Using SFFS, we identified optimal MRI sequence combinations per classification step. The external tests AUCs reached 0.92 for distinguishing adult-type diffuse gliomas from circumscribed astrocytic gliomas/GNTs (T1(+C), Flair, and T2WI combination), 0.92 for distinguishing IDH status for adult-type diffuse glioma (T1(+C)/Flair/ADC), 0.83 for distinguishing 1p/19q status for IDH-mutant diffuse glioma (ADC/Flair), 0.84 for circumscribed astrocytic gliomas vs GNTs (ADC/T1(+C)), 0.95 for PA vs PXA (ADC/T1(+C)/T2WI). Based on the automated prediction pipeline, the integrated classification performance of the MRI-G/GNTs system achieved AUCs of 0.92, 0.81, 0.87, 0.82, 0.94, and 0.69, with accuracy of 0.88, 0.88, 0.89, 0.81, 0.91, and 0.95 across the above six tumor categories.
conclusionsThe MRI-G/GNTs system demonstrates strong capability in distinguishing both histological and molecular subtypes of brain gliomas and GNTs. KEY POINTS: Question How about the deep learning model based on MRI for integrated histology and molecular classification of brain GNTs, and can it be improved? Findings The MRI-G/GNTs system achieved AUCs of 0.69-0.92 with accuracy of 0.81-0.95 for distinguishing six tumor categories of GNTs. Clinical relevance The three-level deep learning classification system (MRI-G/GNTs) based on optimized multimodal MRI integration firstly achieves comprehensive histology and molecular subtype classification of brain GNTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42763331What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.