ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2026
Are we back to normal? Evaluating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on referrals to a child protection service in a tertiary care centre in Vienna, Austria.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReports worldwide on suspected child maltreatment (CM) during and after the COVID-19 pandemic have been inconsistent. As no study has yet systematically examined whether structural disruptions to child protection systems have left measurable and lasting traces in referral patterns beyond the acute crisis phase, this study investigated the pandemic's impact on suspected CM referrals to the Forensic Examination Center for Children and Adolescents (FOKUS) in Vienna, Austria, and whether enduring shifts in CM presentation and referral dynamics have occurred.
methodsRetrospective study using patient administrative data of suspected CM cases referred to FOKUS between 16 March 2019 and 15 March 2023, covering the periods before, during and after the pandemic.
resultsA total of 401 patients were referred to FOKUS during the study period. During the COVID-19 period, suspected physical abuse cases declined by 55.3% (p=0.029), while sexual abuse cases remained stable. Post-pandemic reports of suspected physical abuse returned to pre-pandemic levels, whereas suspected sexual abuse cases increased (p=0.013). Suspected sexual abuse cases showed a progressive increase in median age over time (p=0.025). Psychological support was more frequently required during the pandemic (63.5% vs 43.8% pre-pandemic, p=0.019), with elevated need continuing into the post-pandemic period (59.8%, p=0.018).
conclusionThe ongoing rise in suspected sexual abuse cases accompanied by different age victim profiles and increased need of psychological support following the pandemic indicates that a return to pre-pandemic norms is unlikely and the notion of 'back to normal' seems an oversimplification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.