Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42762795›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

Net energy reduction and intended slow starch formulation decreased fat deposition in broiler chickens offered conventional and reduced crude protein diets.

Damilola U Kareem, Eunjoo Kim, Shemil P Macelline, Tahir Mahmood, Yves Mercier, Mehdi Toghyani, Peter H Selle, Sonia Y Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Damilola U KareemPoultry Research Foundation, The University of Sydney, Camden NSW 2570, Australia; School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia.
Eunjoo KimPoultry Research Foundation, The University of Sydney, Camden NSW 2570, Australia; School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia.
Shemil P MacellinePoultry Research Foundation, The University of Sydney, Camden NSW 2570, Australia; School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia.
Tahir MahmoodAdisseo France S.A.S., European Labs for Innovation, Science and Expertise (ELISE) 20 Rue Prosper Monnet, Saint Fons, 69190, France.
Yves MercierAdisseo France S.A.S., European Labs for Innovation, Science and Expertise (ELISE) 20 Rue Prosper Monnet, Saint Fons, 69190, France.
Mehdi ToghyaniPoultry Research Foundation, The University of Sydney, Camden NSW 2570, Australia; School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia.
Peter H SellePoultry Research Foundation, The University of Sydney, Camden NSW 2570, Australia; Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia.
Sonia Y LiuPoultry Research Foundation, The University of Sydney, Camden NSW 2570, Australia; School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia. Electronic address: sonia.liu@sydney.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The drawbacks of reduced-crude protein (RCP) diets could include poor growth performance and increased fat deposition. Formulating diets with reduced net energy (NE) densities and slower starch digestion rates could mitigate fat deposition without compromising growth performance. Therefore, this study determined how different NE levels and starch digestion rates influence the performance in broilers offered 205 and 175 g/kg CP grower and 190 and 160 g/kg CP finisher diets. The study comprised a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial arrangement with two NE levels (conventional and 75 kcal/kg reduction), two starch digestion rates (with and without field pea inclusion), and two CP levels (standard and 30 g/kg reduction). Each dietary treatment had 7 replicates with 6 birds per replicate, totaling 336 off-sex male Ross 308 broiler chickens over feeding phases of 11-25 and 25-35 d. Conventional NE during d 11-25 and 25-35 periods were 2350 and 2400 kcal/kg, respectively; while the standard CP were 205 and 190 g/kg, respectively. Overall (d 11 - 35), RCP diets compromised growth performance and increased fat deposition (13.8 versus 11.6 g/kg, P< 0.05). Reducing dietary NE significantly reduced relative fat-pad weights by 9.02% (12.1 versus 13.3 g/kg), as did slowly digestible starch (SDS) by 7.58% (12.2 vs 13.2 g/kg). At day 35, the birds' abdominal fat pad was positively correlated ileal starch: protein disappearance rate ratio (r = 0.610; P< 0.001) and breast weight was negatively with ileal starch: protein disappearance rate ratio (r = - 0.485; P< 0.001). In conclusion, moderate reductions in dietary NE can be successfully incorporated into reduced-CP diets to reduce fat pad deposition; however, it remains challenging to maintain growth performance in RCP diets.

Indexed as

Energy metabolismNet energyReduced protein dietSlowly digestible starchStarch-protein digestive dynamics

Identifiers

PMID42762795
PMCPMC13627107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.