Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42762531›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental dental research2026

Association of Oral Health Assessment Tool Findings With Periodontal Screening Outcomes in Adults With Diabetes.

Grace Wong, Sarah Glastras, Sarah Brennan, Marija Saponja, Anna Cheng, Jami Walk, Kyle Cheng, Wenpeng You

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Grace WongOral Health Services, Primary and Community Health, Northern Sydney Local Health District, NSW Health, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1364-6866
Sarah GlastrasDepartment of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, NSW Health, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9317-1348
Sarah BrennanDepartment of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, NSW Health, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8719-4367
Marija SaponjaOral Health Services, Primary and Community Health, Northern Sydney Local Health District, NSW Health, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3464-0718
Anna ChengOral Health Services, Primary and Community Health, Northern Sydney Local Health District, NSW Health, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6666-8199
Jami WalkAboriginal and Torres Strait Island Health Service, Hornsby Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, NSW Health, New South Wales, Australia.
Kyle ChengOral Health Services, Primary and Community Health, Northern Sydney Local Health District, NSW Health, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5136-8828
Wenpeng YouSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6229-1064

Funding

Royal North Shore (RNS) Hospital Campus Research 2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeriodontal disease is common among adults with diabetes, yet periodontal screening is rarely incorporated into routine outpatient diabetes care. The Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT) is a structured observational tool designed for non-dental healthcare professionals; however, its relationship with periodontal screening findings remains unclear.

objectivesTo examine the association between OHAT findings and periodontal screening outcomes in adults attending diabetes outpatient clinics.

methodsThis cross-sectional study included adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes at a tertiary hospital in Sydney, Australia. Periodontal screening was performed using the Periodontal Screening and Recording (PSR) system, and oral health was assessed using OHAT. Periodontal status was dichotomized as no/mild (PSR 0-2) versus moderate-to-severe (PSR ≥ 3). Logistic regression examined associations of OHAT domains and total OHAT burden with periodontal status. Covariate-adjusted models assessed robustness. Screening performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values.

resultsAmong 120 participants (mean age 61.5 years, 64.2% with type 2 diabetes), 71.4% demonstrated moderate-to-severe periodontal findings. Mean OHAT score was 4.99 (SD 2.02). Change/unhealthy ratings for tongue (OR 3.23, 95% CI 1.30-8.02), gums and oral tissues (OR 4.59, 95% CI 1.78-11.85), and increasing categories of decayed teeth (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.05-4.05) were associated with moderate-to-severe findings. Higher total OHAT score (> 5 vs. ≤ 5) was strongly associated with moderate-to-severe periodontal findings (OR 7.00, 95% CI 2.25-21.76), with consistent results. This threshold showed high specificity (87.5%) and positive predictive value (90.9%), but moderate sensitivity (50.0%).

conclusionOHAT findings were associated with moderate-to-severe periodontal screening findings among adults with diabetes, supporting further evaluation of OHAT as a pragmatic screening and referral aid in settings where formal periodontal assessment is not routinely available. Its performance when administered by non-dental clinicians requires further investigation.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Mass ScreeningOral HealthPeriodontal DiseasesAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and Specificitydiabetes mellitusOral Health Assessment ToolOral Health Screening: Primary Careperiodontal diseaseperiodontal screening

Identifiers

PMID42762531
PMCPMC13589649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.