ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2026
Saturation kinetics of iodine accumulation in Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae): implications for feed biofortification.
Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Iodine deficiency remains a widespread nutritional concern, and biofortification of feed ingredients is a promising complement to salt iodization. Insects, such as the yellow mealworm, Tenebrio molitor Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), are gaining attention as sustainable protein sources, yet little is known about their capacity to accumulate iodine. This study quantified dose-dependent iodine accumulation and excretion, and assessed adverse effects, in T. molitor larvae reared on diets spanning more than 3 orders of magnitude of supplemented iodine; saturation kinetics here refers to dose-dependent rather than temporal behavior. Larval iodine increased with supplementation but followed a strongly non-linear trend, a pattern compatible with saturable, carrier-mediated uptake, although no direct mechanistic evidence was obtained. Within the range in which larvae remained viable, accumulation conformed to a saturation model, allowing the half-saturation constant and maximum attainable enrichment to be estimated; at higher doses, larvae did not survive and could not be depurated. Frass iodine rose far more steeply than larval iodine, indicating that surplus iodine was excreted rather than retained. Bioaccumulation efficiency declined progressively with dietary dose, exceeding unity only at low supplementation levels, where larvae concentrated iodine above dietary concentrations. Observational signs of toxicity emerged at elevated supplementation, including growth retardation, heterogeneous development, and increased mortality, culminating in complete population collapse. Practically, the enrichment achievable within the range tolerated by larvae already exceeds concentrations reported as toxic to some target species, indicating that safe inclusion levels will be set by the receiving animal rather than the insect's accumulation capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.