ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2026
Financial concerns: a critical gap in survivors' experience of the implementation of the national standards for cancer survivorship care.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIt is vitally important to comprehensively identify and address cancer survivors' unmet needs. The new national standards for cancer survivorship care may improve survivorship care by defining quality care. The purpose of this convergent mixed-methods study was to describe how survivorship care at one cancer center aligns with the health system processes outlined in the national standards.
methodsSurvey participants (N = 150) were survivors purposively sampled by treatment status, cancer stage, and geographic residence. Survey data evaluated how well providers assessed, listened to, and managed participants' concerns across key domains and were primarily analyzed descriptively. Survey data were complemented by semi-structured interview data from n = 17 survivors, which were analyzed using directed content analysis.
resultsGreater than 70% of participants reported that their providers regularly assessed and listened to physical and emotional concerns. Fewer than 30% reported regular assessment of financial and insurance concerns. Once identified, most concerns were adequately managed by care teams, the exception being practical concerns. Interviewees highlighted quality survivorship care in general with some internal and external barriers. Participants recommended increasing awareness of available services and improving care coordination and navigation related to survivorship care.
conclusionsResults suggest that while survivorship care may align with the national standards related to physical and emotional concerns, there is critical need to improve assessment and management of financial concerns. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Cancer centers should conduct comprehensive screening that includes financial and other practical concerns and implement processes for connecting survivors with needed services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42762402What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.