ArticleNeurogenetics2026
Clinical and genetic findings in Parkinson's disease in a Turkish cohort: a retrospective exome sequencing study.
Article in Neurogenetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder primarily affecting dopaminergic neurons in the mesencephalon. With rising global incidence, especially in individuals over 60, PD presents with motor and non-motor symptoms. While monogenic forms account for a subset of cases, genetic heterogeneity and variable expressivity complicate diagnosis and management. This study aimed to evaluate the genetic profile of a Turkish PD cohort through clinical exome sequencing (CES), assess genotype-phenotype correlations, and identify structural rearrangements. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 137 patients diagnosed with Parkinson's disease according to the Movement Disorder Society (MDS) clinical diagnostic criteria. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis was performed, and identified genetic variants were strictly classified in accordance with the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines and current gene-disease validity consensus. Copy number variations (CNVs) were assessed utilizing NGS read-depth algorithms. Following rigorous evaluation according to ACMG criteria and current gene-disease validity consensus, definitive disease-causing variants explaining the PD phenotype were identified in 10 patients (7.30%). This definitive diagnostic yield was driven entirely by established PD loci: GBA1 (9 patients) and a homozygous deletion in PRKN (1 patient). Beyond this definitive group, several notable variants in OMIM-associated PD genes (including LRRK2, FBXO7, PARK7, and EIF4G1) were characterized as VUS or susceptibility findings, displaying strong clinical correlations with progressive motor and complex phenotypes. A monoallelic PINK1 variant and findings in GIGYF2 and UCHL1 were strictly excluded from the causal diagnostic yield. A novel heterozygous duplication involving LRRK2 exons 6-20 was also identified; however, as it likely results in a loss of function, its pathogenicity remains uncertain under dominant gain-of-function models. Clinical exome sequencing effectively delineates the complex genetic landscape of PD in the Turkish population. While the definitive diagnostic rate is 7.30% under strict causal criteria, the characterization of prominent VUS in OMIM-associated genes and a novel LRRK2 structural variant undetected by routine MLPA highlights the evolving complexity of PD genetics and the critical need for integrating comprehensive, read-depth-based CNV analysis into standard pipelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42762359What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.