ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Subclassification of Vieth stage 4 in MRI of the proximal tibial epiphysis: a pilot study for forensic age estimation.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The MRI-based staging system introduced by Vieth et al. has been successfully validated for assessment of the proximal tibial epiphysis. Our previous validation study suggested that additional information regarding completion of the 16th or 18th year of life might be obtained by applying a more fine-grained subclassification of Vieth stage 4. Therefore, the present pilot study investigated the feasibility and potential forensic value of a subclassification of Vieth stage 4. The study cohort comprised 57 T1-weighted MRI examinations of the proximal tibial epiphysis (24 males and 33 females) previously assigned to Vieth stage 4. All examinations were re-assessed using newly defined morphological criteria, allowing Vieth stage 4 to be further subdivided into three novel substages (4a-4c). All cases could be assigned to one of the proposed substages, although substage 4a occurred in only five individuals. Minimum ages in males were 15.45, 15.68, and 15.23 years for substages 4a, 4b, and 4c, while the minimum ages in females were 12.64, 12.57, and 13.18 years. Intra- and interobserver agreement were good (κ = 0.751 and κ = 0.663, respectively). The findings demonstrate that a morphological subclassification of Vieth stage 4 at the proximal tibial epiphysis is feasible. The proposed substages may assist in verifying completion of the 14th year of life but did not permit reliable verification of completion of the 16th or 18th year of life. Although the proposed subclassification is currently not suitable for routine forensic age estimation, it may nevertheless contribute to a more detailed understanding of skeletal maturation at the proximal tibial epiphysis and serve as a basis for future validation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42762297What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.