ArticleUrolithiasis2026
Technique-stratified whole-stone laser energy consumption during RIRS using a 150-W Ho: YAG laser.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To determine whether technique-stratified whole-stone laser energy consumption (LEC) provides interpretable benchmarking during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) performed with a 150-W holmium: YAG platform. This retrospective single-center cohort identified 350 procedures performed from January 2023 to January 2025 and included all 300 eligible procedures (100 per technique). Total energy was reconstructed from case-level pulse energy, frequency, and laser-on time. Whole-stone LEC was energy divided by preoperative computed-tomography stone volume. Strict zero-residual stone-free rate (SFR) and < 2 mm clinical success were assessed by computed tomography at 3 months. Median whole-stone LEC was 19.3 [17.1-22.0] J/mm³ for dusting, 11.7 [10.4-13.3] for fragmentation, and 24.1 [21.3-27.6] for pop-dusting (p < 0.001). Fragmentation used the least total energy but had the longest operation time. Strict SFR was 71.0%, 80.0%, and 67.0% (p = 0.107), whereas clinical success was 93.0%, 93.0%, and 94.0% (p = 0.948). After adjustment for comorbidity, stone volume, density, and lower-calyx location predicted strict SFR; technique and LEC did not. Adding technique and LEC did not improve repeated cross-validated discrimination and produced modest overfitting. Technique-specific whole-stone LEC is best interpreted as a benchmarking measure alongside operative time and CT outcomes, not as an independent preoperative predictor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42762296What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.