ArticleBrain structure & function2026
Sex-related variability of white-matter tracts is robust to tractography methodology.
Article in Brain structure & function, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diffusion tractography is the prominent in-vivo technique to study and investigate white-matter pathways in the human brain. While tractography is a powerful method, recent work suggests that different tractography methods can produce strikingly different representations of the same white-matter pathway. This multitude of differing options and diverging pipelines makes tractography related group-effects difficult to generalize, as it is currently unclear whether group-level inferences made using one tractography pipeline can be expected to hold when a different, equally defensible pipeline is applied to the same data. Here, we test the generalizability of sex-related changes on tractography-derived features by analyzing the exact same datasets with two equally reasonable pipelines which differ in model fitting, tractography reconstruction, and microstructure and volumetric analysis. We found that despite differences in analysis, the resulting patterns and biological interpretations of sex effects rarely disagreed across methods. Microstructural sex-related effects between methods were remarkably consistent between protocols, only displaying one statistically significant disagreement out of 343 comparisons (0.29%). However, discrepancies were more common among normalized pathway-volume effects, producing 8 out of the 9 total statistically significant disagreements between methods. Moreover, we found that the two tractography methods are differentially sensitive to tractography-derived features, as bundles derived from targeted tractography were much more sensitive to volumetric effects than tractogram-based tractography, potentially explaining the volumetric discrepancy between methods. This study indicates that reasonable methodological choices are unlikely to lead two investigators to fundamentally opposing conclusions about sex differences in white-matter, and that the robustness of tractography findings is similar to established fields of science. More broadly, this study presents an optimistic outlook on the future of tractography, and provides an initial empirical comparison of cross-pipeline robustness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.