Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42762250›Full record

ArticleUrolithiasis2026

Complication profiling in ureteroscopy: A prospective multicenter comparison of the Clavien-Dindo classification and the comprehensive complication index.

Yiloren Tanidir, Tunahan Ates, Reha Girgin, Murat Gulsen, Onur Kalayci, Cemil Aydin, Metin Kizgin, Volkan Sen, Can Sinirsiz, Ilker Akarken and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urolithiasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06394908 (Registry of Minimally Invasive Urology Society for Urolithiasis Patients), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06394908 enrolling by invitationnot on this map

Registry of Minimally Invasive Urology Society for Urolithiasis Patients

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorMarmara UniversityRan2023 to 2030Enrolled10,000ConditionsUrolithiasis, Stone, Kidney, Stone Ureter, Complication of Surgical Procedure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Yiloren TanidirVocational School of Health Services, Department of Operating Room Services, Istanbul Kent University, Istanbul, Turkey. yiloren@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1607-5819
Tunahan AtesDepartment of Urology, Defne State Hospital, Hatay, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9087-290X
Reha GirginDepartment of Urology, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1132-8629
Murat GulsenDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5371-0960
Onur KalayciDepartment of Urology, Samsun City Hospital, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6898-7564
Cemil AydinDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Hitit University, Çorum, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7271-5748
Metin KizginDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Hitit University, Çorum, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-5862-2369
Volkan SenDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2832-0682
Can SinirsizDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8237-7968
Ilker AkarkenDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Mugla Sıtkı Kocman University, Menteşe, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2863-3112
Eren Can AydinDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Mugla Sıtkı Kocman University, Menteşe, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-7629-9333
Tarik Emre SenerDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0085-7680
Dogancan DorucuDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9714-3336
Ahmet Furkan OzsoyDepartment of Urology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8134-7484
Yunus Emre GogerDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4480-9093
Nebil AkdoganDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9756-8775

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Clavien-Dindo Classification remains the most widely accepted method for grading surgical complications. The Comprehensive Complication Index, a continuous scale integrating all postoperative events, may provide a more comprehensive overview. This study compared the sensitivity and clinical applicability of the Clavien-Dindo Classification and the Comprehensive Complication Index in assessing complications following ureteroscopic stone surgery. In this multicenter prospective study, data from patients undergoing ureteroscopic stone surgery were collected, including demographic, perioperative, and complication variables. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo Classification, and cumulative morbidity was subsequently calculated using the Comprehensive Complication Index based on assigned Clavien-Dindo grades. Patients were stratified by minor (I-II) or major (≥ III) complications. Correlation analyses between complication scores and clinical parameters, including comorbidity indices and hospital stay, were performed. A total of 1607 patients were included; 98 (6.1%) experienced complications. Comprehensive Complication Index showed a numerically higher correlation with hospital stay in patients with minor complications, whereas Clavien-Dindo Classification showed a numerically higher correlation in patients with major complications; however, formal statistical comparison of these correlations did not demonstrate a significant difference between the two systems. In 39 patients, Comprehensive Complication Index exceeded corresponding the Clavien-Dindo Classification grade, suggesting improved sensitivity for overall morbidity. Both systems showed moderate correlations with comorbidity indices and hospital stay; however, the Comprehensive Complication Index performed better with multiple minor complications. Limitations of this study include its observational nature, the lack of long-term patient-reported quality of life outcomes, and potential variations in surgeon experience across the participating centers. Comprehensive Complication Index provides refined reflection of cumulative minor complications, while Clavien-Dindo Classification offers clearer categorization of major events. Neither system demonstrated absolute superiority; however, their combined application may enhance complication reporting and facilitate comprehensive outcome assessment in ureteroscopic stone surgery. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (https//clinicaltrials.gov), NCT06394908.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsUreteral CalculiUreteroscopyAdultAgedFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesClavien-Dindo ClassificationComprehensive Complication IndexPostoperative ComplicationsSurgical MorbidityUreteroscopyUrolithiasis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.