Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42761963›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2026

Enhanced Marginal Sensitivity Model and Bounds.

Yi Zhang, Wenfu Xu, Zhiqiang Tan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yi ZhangDepartment of Statistics, Rutgers University.
Wenfu XuCollege of Economics and Management, China Jiliang University.
Zhiqiang TanDepartment of Statistics, Rutgers University.

Funding

Novel and Rigorous Statistical Learning and Inference for Comparative Effectiveness Research with Complex DataR01LM014257 · NLM · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI Zhiqiang Tan · 2023 to 2026
$1.4M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM014257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensitivity analysis is important to assess the impact of unmeasured confounding in causal inference from observational studies. The marginal sensitivity model (MSM) provides a useful approach in quantifying the influence of unmeasured confounders on treatment assignment and leading to tractable sharp bounds of common causal parameters. In this paper, to tighten MSM sharp bounds, we propose the enhanced MSM (eMSM) by incorporating another sensitivity constraint which quantifies the influence of unmeasured confounders on outcomes. We derive sharp population bounds of expected potential outcomes under eMSM, which are always narrower than the MSM sharp bounds in a simple and interpretable way. We further discuss desirable specifications of sensitivity parameters related to the outcome sensitivity constraint, and obtain both doubly robust point estimation and confidence intervals for the eMSM population bounds. The effectiveness of eMSM is also demonstrated numerically through two real-data applications. Our development represents for the first time a satisfactory extension of MSM to exploit both treatment and outcome sensitivity constraints on unmeasured confounding.

Indexed as

Causal inferenceDouble robustnessSensitivity analysisSharp boundsUnmeasured confounding

Identifiers

PMID42761963
PMCPMC13588281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.