ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Maximizing Robotic Efficiency in Paired Kidney Transplantation at a Resource-Limited County Hospital.
Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Kidney transplantation is the best option for overcoming kidney replacement therapy in end-stage kidney disease. Yet the number of available deceased donors is limited. Living donor kidney transplantation offers an effective strategy to expand the donor pool, and kidney paired donation has emerged as an important alternative option. Methods: In our cases, the primary consideration was immunological incompatibility in one living donor-recipient pair and the need to appropriately match kidney volume in another pair. We retrospectively analyzed our 2-way kidney paired donation cases in which Recipient 1 received a kidney from Donor 2, and Recipient 2 received a kidney from Donor 1. In all 4 cases, the living donor nephrectomies and transplant procedures were performed using a robotic-assisted approach. Results: Both donors experienced no perioperative or postoperative complications. Both recipients demonstrated immediately graft function, with progressive normalization of serum creatinine levels through 24 months post-transplant. We successfully performed 2 robotic-assisted living donor nephrectomies and their corresponding robotic-assisted living donor kidney transplants using a single robotic platform. All procedures were conducted at our public county hospital, where resources are carefully allocated to serve the community. Conclusions: Based on the favorable outcomes observed in our robotic transplant program, the hospital plans to expand its robotic surgery program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.