Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42761871›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Ictal laughter induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke patients: a case series.

Shusheng Jiao, Xiuhong Xu

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shusheng JiaoDepartment of Neurology, Bethune International Peace Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Xiuhong XuDepartment of Neurology, Bethune International Peace Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a well-established neuromodulation technique for post-stroke motor rehabilitation with a favorable safety profile. However, its safety in patients with acute/subacute cerebral infarction remains incompletely characterized, particularly regarding unusual behavioral responses. Gelastic seizures, characterized by stereotyped, inappropriate laughter without a corresponding emotional trigger, are a rare form of focal epilepsy typically associated with hypothalamic hamartomas or other structural brain lesions. Their induction by rTMS has been exceptionally reported. Case presentations: We report two cases of acute ischemic stroke in right-handed middle-aged males who developed stimulus-locked ictal laughter during low-frequency (1 Hz) rTMS applied to the left primary motor cortex (M1) for upper limb rehabilitation. Case 1 was a 48-year-old male with right temporo-parieto-occipital infarction who developed recurrent, uncontrollable ictal laughter during the third rTMS session. The laughter was site-specific and reproducible, elicited only when the coil was positioned over the left M1 and ceasing upon repositioning to the prefrontal area. Post-stimulation video-electroencephalography (VEEG) with bipolar montage analysis revealed sporadic single sharp waves over the right anterior temporal (F8), bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (F3, 4) during wakefulness. Seven months later, upon re-challenge, the patient promptly reported an urge to laugh, leading to immediate cessation. Case 2 was a 42-year-old male with a right lacunar infarct in the globus pallidus and internal capsule who developed ictal-like laughter during the fifth rTMS session, preceded by a premonitory urge to laugh during the fourth session. Consciousness was fully preserved in both patients, and each reported post-ictal dysphoria. Discontinuation of rTMS resulted in complete symptom resolution, with no recurrence at follow-up. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first report of rTMS-induced ictal laughter in stroke patients. These observations expand the spectrum of rTMS-associated adverse effects, challenge the assumption that low-frequency protocols are uniformly safe in the post-stroke population, and underscore the need for clinical vigilance in patients with structural brain lesions.

Indexed as

adverse effectcase seriesgelastic seizureictal laughterrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)stroke rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42761871
PMCPMC13587797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.