ReviewPlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Graft Biology in the CRISPR Era: From Tissue Fusion to Genome Compatibility.
Review in Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant lineage has traditionally constrained grafting compatibility, with monocots generally considered incompatible because of their dispersed vascular bundles and limited secondary growth. Recent studies have shown that embryonic grafting can establish successful graft unions in selected monocot systems by exploiting early developmental plasticity before anatomical constraints become fully established. Experimental evidence from cereals and orchids has demonstrated callus adhesion, vascular reconnection, and early tissue integration under controlled conditions, indicating that embryonic grafting represents a promising developmental approach distinct from conventional grafting. However, successful graft union formation does not necessarily ensure long-term functional integration. Current evidence indicates that distant grafts may exhibit developmental desynchronization, endoplasmic reticulum stress-associated reproductive defects, genomic dosage imbalance, and sterility, while reproducibility across taxa and translation beyond controlled environments remains poorly understood. Genome-editing studies have identified sterility-associated genes (ORF3/4/5, Ms1, and S-RNase), flowering regulators (Hd1 and FT homologs), and meristem-vascular identity genes (WUS, CUC/LOB, and MADS-box family members) as candidate targets for investigating mechanisms underlying compatibility and reproductive stability. However, the application of these molecular approaches to embryonic graft-derived systems remains largely unexplored. This review synthesizes current advances in embryonic grafting, discusses the molecular basis of graft compatibility and reproductive stability, and highlights key challenges and future research directions for integrating developmental biology with genome editing to improve graft success across wider taxonomic boundaries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.