Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42761838›Full record

ReviewPlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)2026

Graft Biology in the CRISPR Era: From Tissue Fusion to Genome Compatibility.

Melagani Subash Chandra Gowda Sahaja, Melagani Subash Chandra Gowda Sahana, Revathi Thottathil, Chithra Rekha, Poomangalath Priyada, Vidhu Sankar Babu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melagani Subash Chandra Gowda SahajaDepartment of Plant Sciences Manipal School of Life Sciences, Academy of Higher Education Manipal Karnataka India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0274-7744
Melagani Subash Chandra Gowda SahanaDepartment of Plant Sciences Manipal School of Life Sciences, Academy of Higher Education Manipal Karnataka India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5973-7028
Revathi ThottathilDepartment of Plant Sciences Manipal School of Life Sciences, Academy of Higher Education Manipal Karnataka India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7408-1871
Chithra RekhaDepartment of Plant Sciences Manipal School of Life Sciences, Academy of Higher Education Manipal Karnataka India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2227-1062
Poomangalath PriyadaDepartment of Plant Sciences Manipal School of Life Sciences, Academy of Higher Education Manipal Karnataka India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7405-3862
Vidhu Sankar BabuDepartment of Plant Sciences Manipal School of Life Sciences, Academy of Higher Education Manipal Karnataka India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6377-5872

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant lineage has traditionally constrained grafting compatibility, with monocots generally considered incompatible because of their dispersed vascular bundles and limited secondary growth. Recent studies have shown that embryonic grafting can establish successful graft unions in selected monocot systems by exploiting early developmental plasticity before anatomical constraints become fully established. Experimental evidence from cereals and orchids has demonstrated callus adhesion, vascular reconnection, and early tissue integration under controlled conditions, indicating that embryonic grafting represents a promising developmental approach distinct from conventional grafting. However, successful graft union formation does not necessarily ensure long-term functional integration. Current evidence indicates that distant grafts may exhibit developmental desynchronization, endoplasmic reticulum stress-associated reproductive defects, genomic dosage imbalance, and sterility, while reproducibility across taxa and translation beyond controlled environments remains poorly understood. Genome-editing studies have identified sterility-associated genes (ORF3/4/5, Ms1, and S-RNase), flowering regulators (Hd1 and FT homologs), and meristem-vascular identity genes (WUS, CUC/LOB, and MADS-box family members) as candidate targets for investigating mechanisms underlying compatibility and reproductive stability. However, the application of these molecular approaches to embryonic graft-derived systems remains largely unexplored. This review synthesizes current advances in embryonic grafting, discusses the molecular basis of graft compatibility and reproductive stability, and highlights key challenges and future research directions for integrating developmental biology with genome editing to improve graft success across wider taxonomic boundaries.

Indexed as

autotetraploidyCRISPR/Cas genome editingdevelopmental plasticityembryonic graftinggraft compatibilityvascular reconnection

Identifiers

PMID42761838
PMCPMC13587702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.