ReviewHealth psychology and behavioral medicine2026
An empirical analysis of Living Well (
Review in Health psychology and behavioral medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is extensive scientific debate regarding ancestral knowledge of Living Well ( Objective: The basis for this article is a systematic review of scientific articles that empirically analyse Living Well in LAC, guided by the following questions: In which countries and indigenous communities has this topic been researched? Which have been the main methodologies used? Have they been participative in nature? Which dimensions of Living Well have studies most frequently examined? Methods: The SALSA methodology (Search, AppraisaL, Synthesis and Analysis) was used to carry out the systematic literature review. The Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, Dialnet, SciELO and PubMed bibliography databases were selected to search and identify relevant literature. Results: The results show 57 studies, led by Colombia (13) and Ecuador (12), mainly based on qualitative research (49), with a limited number using participative methodologies (10). This review includes 58 indigenous peoples, with the most extensively studied being the Quechua/Kichwa/Kiwcha people (16). Conclusion: The underlying dimensions can be grouped into: nature and territory; community organisation; health and holistic wellbeing; intergenerational care and gender roles; and indigenous and intercultural training and education. Although not constituting an independent dimension, several studies also explored the values and principles underpinning Living Well across these thematic area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.