ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Equine dystocia in Sweden (2006-2022): a retrospective analysis of mare and foal survival.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dystocia is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening complication of equine parturition. Due to early separation of the chorioallantois during the expulsive stage, fetal oxygen supply rapidly becomes compromised, making dystocia a time-critical emergency for both mare and foal. Objectives: To describe obstetrical interventions performed at equine referral hospitals, evaluate mare and foal survival, and identify factors associated with survival outcomes in a Swedish population where geographic distances may influence access to specialized veterinary care. Methods: Medical records from three equine referral hospitals in central Sweden were reviewed for dystocia cases presented between January 2006 and December 2022. Data collected included dystocia causes, obstetrical interventions, dystocia duration, prior veterinary intervention, and survival outcomes for mares and foals. Results: A total of 138 dystocia cases were included. Fetal causes of dystocia predominated (114/138), with malposition being most common (106/138). Controlled vaginal delivery was the most frequently performed intervention (33.3%, 46/138). Of 140 foals delivered, 17.1% were born alive and 12.1% survived hospital discharge. Foal survival was not different among delivery methods ( Conclusion: Duration of dystocia prior to hospital admission was a key factor associated with neonatal survival, highlighting the importance of early recognition of dystocia, close monitoring of mares approaching foaling, and prompt referral to specialized equine hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.