Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42761769›Full record

ArticleInnovations in clinical neuroscience

Stroke Classification in Brain CT Images Using Transfer Learning With Fastai.

Shilpa Bajaj, Manju Bala, Mohit Angurala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovations in clinical neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shilpa BajajDr. Bajaj is with Applied Sciences (Computer Applications), I.K. Gujral Punjab Technical University, Kapurthala, Punjab, India.
Manju BalaDr. Bala is with Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Khalsa College of Engineering and Technology, Amritsar, Punjab, India.
Mohit AnguralaDr. Angurala is with Department of Computer Science, Guru Nanak Dev University College, Pathankot, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To identify strokes, which rank among the leading global causes of death, doctors commonly employ computed tomography (CT) imaging. Researchers are increasingly applying deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML) methods to improve the accuracy of stroke classification and detection. In particular, DL methods have demonstrated significant potential in segmenting stroke regions within brain medical images. However, training convolutional neural networks from scratch is challenging due to dataset size constraints. Achieving timely and precise stroke diagnosis remains a significant hurdle. The purpose of this research is to classify brain stroke cases using CT scan images through transfer learning strategies. Pretrained architectures including ResNet, VGG, Inception, and EfficientNet are utilized, with optimization carried out in the fastai framework to improve computational efficiency and reduce training time. We developed these artifical intelligence (AI) systems by training them with data, making adjustments throughout the process to ultimately categorize patients as having a stroke or not. We evaluated different models using measures such as accuracy, speed, and how well they differentiate normal and stroke-affected CT scans of the brain. This helped us choose the most effective model. In this research, ResNet50 outperformed other models in accuracy (88%), and DCNN was the most time-efficient model.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networksCT image classificationdeep learningfeature extractionStroke

Identifiers

PMID42761769
PMCPMC13588659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.