Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42761768›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026

Beyond binary measures: introducing a safety net hospital index.

Fredric Blavin, Avani Pugazhendhi, Stephen Zuckerman, John Holahan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fredric BlavinPolicy Development and Research, Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, Washington, DC 20001, United States.
Avani PugazhendhiHealth Policy Division, Urban Institute, Washington, DC 20024, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9022-3756
Stephen ZuckermanHealth Policy Division, Urban Institute, Washington, DC 20024, United States.
John HolahanHealth Policy Division, Urban Institute, Washington, DC 20024, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Safety net hospitals (SNHs) disproportionately serve uninsured, Medicaid, and low-income Medicare patients, yet no universally accepted SNH definition exists. Existing binary measures frequently identify divergent hospital sets, creating research inconsistency and risking misaligned policy protections, concerns heightened by recent federal Medicaid cuts and site-neutral payment reforms. Methods: Using Medicare cost report data for community hospitals, we introduce and validate a continuous, multidimensional SNH Index constructed as a composite of Medicaid revenue share, uncompensated care burden, and low-income Medicare share. Results: Hospitals in the highest SNH Index quartile had substantially lower operating margins (-2.0% vs 3.1% in the lowest quartile), fewer days cash on hand (91 vs 158 days), and higher rates of financial distress (36% vs 21%). The SNH Index showed stronger correlations with financial performance than 5 binary SNH definitions and a proxy for MACPAC's Medicare SNH Index. Within each quartile, system-affiliated hospitals significantly outperformed independent hospitals financially. Conclusion: These findings suggest that policies protecting SNHs should incorporate composite, burden-based measures, and account for system-level financial resources rather than relying on binary classifications alone.

Indexed as

health care safety nethealth care systemshospitalsuncompensated careuninsured

Identifiers

PMID42761768
PMCPMC13587247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.