Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42761755›Full record

ReviewHuman reproduction open2026

Effect of cryopreservation duration on pregnancy outcomes in embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bowen Wei, Yinni Chen, Jiayi Nie, Xiating Li, Kecheng Wei, Yuxiang Wan, Jingzhen Lai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human reproduction open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bowen WeiDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, The Reproductive Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Yinni ChenLife Sciences Institute, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Jiayi NieLife Sciences Institute, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Xiating LiSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Kecheng WeiSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Yuxiang WanLife Sciences Institute, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Jingzhen LaiLife Sciences Institute, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2054-6396

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionIs prolonged cryopreservation associated with adverse clinical pregnancy and live birth after frozen-thawed embryo transfer? SUMMARY ANSWER: Prolonged embryo cryopreservation is associated with lower clinical pregnancy and live birth rates, particularly within the first 3-12 months of storage, but rates plateau after 2 years. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Evidence on the impact of cryopreservation duration on reproductive outcomes remains scarce and conflicting, with some studies reporting no adverse effects and others suggesting increased risks of pregnancy loss, preterm birth, and epigenetic alterations after prolonged storage. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing pregnancy outcomes by cryopreservation duration. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 31 December 2025, for English-language articles. The search strategy combined terms for embryos (e.g. 'Embryo', 'Blastocyst'), cryopreservation techniques (e.g. 'vitrification', 'cryopreservation', 'freezing'), and pregnancy outcomes (e.g. 'pregnancy', 'live birth') using Boolean operators. A total of 5208 records were identified from PubMed, 9272 from Embase, and 331 from the Cochrane Library. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING

methodsTwo independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Inclusion required reporting of clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) or live birth rate (LBR) stratified by cryopreservation duration. Studies on donated embryos, preimplantation genetic testing, or gamete cryopreservation were excluded. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models based on heterogeneity ( MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 14 811 records were screened (5208 from PubMed, 9272 from Embase, 331 from Cochrane). After removal of duplicates, 11 077 records were screened by title and abstract, and 785 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Twenty-three studies (254 017 transfer cycles/patients) were included. Embryos cryopreserved >5 years had lower survival rates (OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72-0.98, LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Limitations include substantial heterogeneity across studies (design, cryopreservation method, embryonic stage, confounder adjustment), inability to evaluate frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycle type, maternal age, and embryo quality due to inconsistent reporting, retrospective observational design precluding causal inference, residual confounding, potential survivor bias, and combined singleton/multiple-birth data for neonatal outcomes. Despite a large sample size (254 017 cycles), these factors warrant cautious interpretation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThis comprehensive meta‑analysis reveals a non‑linear relationship between cryopreservation duration and outcomes, reconciling previous conflicting reports by demonstrating early declines (first 3-12 months) followed by a plateau beyond 2 years. The stability of outcomes in ultra‑long storage is reassuring for patients requiring delayed transfer. These findings support clinical counselling that encourages early transfer when feasible, but provides reassurance that ultra‑long storage does not lead to progressive deterioration in pregnancy or neonatal outcomes.

fundingThis work was funded by the First-class discipline innovation-driven talent program of Guangxi Medical University (to J.L.) and the College Students' Innovation Training Project of Guangxi Medical University (X202410598348). DISCLOSURES: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024555362.

Indexed as

cryopreservationdurationembryolong-termpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42761755
PMCPMC13588701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.