ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Biological barriers underlying the extremely high fatality of symptomatic rabies: neuroinvasion, immune evasion, and blood-brain barrier restriction.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rabies remains one of the most preventable fatal infections, yet once clinical symptoms appear, survival is exceedingly rare. This paradox cannot be explained simply by the absence of a single effective antiviral drug. In this review, we frame symptomatic rabies as a sequential barrier-driven disease process in which neuroinvasion, immune evasion, and blood-brain barrier restriction converge to make post-symptom rescue biologically difficult. Rabies virus first changes the anatomical battlefield by entering peripheral nerves, exploiting receptor-supported uptake and retrograde axonal transport, and establishing infection within protected neural circuits. It then delays the host counterattack through weak or strain-dependent innate sensing, viral interference with interferon and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling, and insufficient conversion of peripheral immune activation into effective central nervous system clearance. Once central nervous system (CNS) infection is established, blood-brain barrier restriction further limits access of neutralizing antibodies, antiviral compounds, biologics, and immune cells to infected neural tissue. The convergence of these barriers permits CNS persistence and drives fatal encephalopathy, characterized less by widespread neuronal destruction than by synaptic, dendritic, circuit, autonomic, and functional collapse. Recent experimental advances, including CNS-accessible antibody strategies, blood-brain barrier (BBB)-modulating approaches, monoclonal antibody therapy, and One Medicine models, suggest that symptomatic rabies may require stage-specific therapeutic combinations rather than a single rescue intervention. We propose that future rabies therapy should be organized around three translational windows: preventing neuroinvasion before CNS entry, achieving immune-assisted viral control during early CNS infection, and combining CNS viral clearance with neuroprotective and autonomic support once encephalopathy is established. However, most mechanistic and therapeutic evidence remains derived from cellular and animal models, and clinical validation of CNS-directed or barrier-targeted interventions in symptomatic human rabies remains limited. Breaking the barrier cascade may be the central requirement for making symptomatic rabies treatable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.