ArticleDigital discovery2026
TRPM8 virtual screening: the essential role of target-specific, inactive-enriched machine-learning scoring functions.
Article in Digital discovery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Transient Receptor Potential Melastatin 8 (TRPM8) ion channel is an emerging therapeutic target implicated in pain, inflammation and other disorders. While structure-based virtual screening (VS) is widely used in drug discovery, the effectiveness of generic and target-specific machine-learning (ML) scoring functions (SFs) for ion channels such as TRPM8 remains to be investigated. We established the first comprehensive structure-based VS benchmark for TRPM8. This evaluates classical docking SFs, generic ML SFs and target-specific ML models retrospectively across multiple TRPM8 protein conformations and docking protocols. The evaluation revealed that generic ML rescoring at most provided modest and conformation-dependent improvements over classical docking on this target. Target-specific ML models based only on protein-ligand interaction fingerprints improved early enrichment on test sets when regression algorithms were employed. However, performance remained sensitive to protein conformation choice and chemical dissimilarity. Systematic evaluation of feature representations showed that combining structure-derived interaction features with ligand-based descriptors enhanced enrichment under selected docking tool-protein conformation combinations. Critically, presenting the learning algorithm with many more negative training instances,
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.