ArticleJournal of pediatrics. Clinical practice2026
Pediatric Water Bead Ingestion: Experience from a Quaternary Care Children's Hospital and a Proposed Management Algorithm.
Article in Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Water bead ingestion has become increasingly common, with variation in management strategies. This study examines the presentation, management, and complications associated with water bead ingestion at a quaternary care children's hospital, situating it within the broader context of the medical literature and proposing a management algorithm. Study design: This is a case series of pediatric patients who presented to a quaternary care children's emergency department for water bead ingestion from 2015 to 2024. Results: There were 36 pediatric encounters involving water bead ingestion from 2015 to 2024, with a median age of 2 years (IQR, 1-6), and the majority (n = 28, 78%) were asymptomatic. A total of 52 imaging studies were performed, of which 4 (8%) were abnormal. Endoscopy was performed in 6 (17%) patient encounters, none of which successfully retrieved water beads. In our case series, there were no patients with bowel obstructions or complications. Conclusions: Best practices for managing children with water bead ingestion remain unclear. Although there were no complications noted in this study, complications due to water bead ingestion do occur, and we support continued efforts to decrease the risk of injury and death associated with water bead ingestions. Upon reviewing our findings and comparing them with current literature, we propose a new algorithm for managing water bead ingestion. This algorithm is intended as a provisional, experience-informed framework to guide management, reduce unnecessary interventions, and standardize care but will require further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.