ArticleAfrican journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence2026
Factors affecting time-to-disposition at a district hospital emergency centre in Cape Town, South Africa.
Article in African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Emergency centre crowding adversely affects the quality of care, and the wellbeing of both patients and healthcare providers. The interplay between emergency centre crowding and clinicians' time-to-disposition remains poorly understood, with evidence of complex associations involving system-level variables. This study describes and quantifies factors influencing time-to-disposition at a district-level hospital emergency centre in Cape Town, South Africa. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of an existing dataset comprising all emergency centre consultations in a Cape Town District Hospital Emergency Centre over three randomly selected four-week periods in 2019. A retrospective chart review was performed on a random subsample (n=1,000) to assess the impact of special investigations. Multivariable binary logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of prolonged time-to-disposition. Results: A total of 9,356 consultations were analysed. The overall median (IQR) time-to-disposition was 95 (33-241) minutes; 32.8% exceeded three hours. Triage acuity was the strongest independent predictor of time-to-disposition exceeding three hours in multivariable analysis (Emergent vs Routine: aOR 5.30, 95% CI 3.72-7.55; Very Urgent: aOR 3.61, 95% CI 2.67-4.89), paediatric age group (aOR 0.30) and trauma presentation (aOR 0.65) were independently protective. Registrar (resident) managed consultations were independently associated with prolonged time-to-disposition (aOR 1.35, 95% CI 1.18-1.55). Special investigations were the dominant predictor in the investigations subsample (aOR 6.96, 95% CI 4.43-10.94), with laboratory turnaround, median 198 (127-301) minutes from specimen collection to registration, identified as the principal bottleneck. Very urgent presentations (47.2% of patients) and admitted patients (36.5%) represented the highest-impact subgroups by combined burden of prolonged time-to-disposition and patient volume. Discussion: Triage acuity, age group, trauma category, clinician category, and special investigations were independently associated with time-to-disposition. Laboratory turnaround is a major modifiable contributor to throughput delays. Interventions targeting high-impact subgroups, particularly very urgent presentations, admitted patients, and those requiring laboratory investigations, offer the greatest potential for improving throughput.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.