ArticleAnesthesiology research and practice2026
Factors Associated With Postoperative Pain Severity and Patient Satisfaction Among Post-Caesarean Women in Rajshahi District, Bangladesh.
Article in Anesthesiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Caesarean delivery (CD) is a common surgical procedure, and effective postoperative pain (POP) management is essential for maternal recovery and psychological well-being. Despite the increasing use of CD in Bangladesh, evidence regarding POP severity, pain-related outcomes, and patient satisfaction remains limited, particularly in regional healthcare settings. This study assessed POP severity, pain management outcomes, patient satisfaction, and factors associated with satisfaction among women undergoing CD in Rajshahi District, Bangladesh. Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted between November and December 2024 among 297 women who had undergone CD within the previous 24 h in selected public and private healthcare facilities in Rajshahi District. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using the Bangla version of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R). Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with satisfaction with pain management. Results: Substantial POP was reported during the first 24 h after CD. Overall, 84.2% of participants experienced moderate-to-severe pain, while 72.1% rated their worst pain as severe. Pain substantially interfered with physical activities, with moderate-to-severe interference reported for activities in bed (84.9%) and out of bed (76.1%). Emotional distress was also considerable, particularly fear (78.1%), anxiety (68.4%), helplessness (54.9%), and depression (52.9%). Despite this pain burden, 65.0% of women were satisfied with their pain management. However, 35.0% reported no pain relief, while only 5.7% reported complete relief. Adverse drug effects were reported by 34.0% of participants. In multivariable analysis, women aged 25-29 years had lower odds of satisfaction than those aged ≥ 30 years (AOR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.19-0.96), whereas overweight women had higher odds of satisfaction than obese women (AOR = 3.27, 95% CI: 1.26-8.49). Those who received no pain medication also had higher odds of satisfaction (AOR = 5.49, 95% CI: 1.37-22.06). Conclusion: Women undergoing CD in Rajshahi District experienced a substantial burden of POP, physical interference, and emotional distress despite relatively high overall satisfaction with pain management. Limited pain relief and inadequate pharmacological management appear to be important concerns. Strengthening standardized, multimodal, and patient-centered POP management may improve pain control and maternal recovery following CD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.