Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42761533›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2026

Identifying mounting behaviour in boars using deep learning-based instance segmentation and binary classification - a pilot study.

Harry Aricibasi, Jessica Bode, Renée Bergeron, Dan Tulpan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Harry AricibasiDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Jessica BodeDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Renée BergeronDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Dan TulpanDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Mounting behaviour in group-housed pigs poses significant welfare and productivity challenges, often resulting in injuries and stress. To address this issue, we developed a novel computer vision-based approach for the automatic detection of mounting behaviour in pigs. Methods: The pilot study was conducted on eight boars, aged 4-5 months and weighing between 60 and 90 kg, housed in two groups of four. Continuous video footage was collected over a 1-week period using an overhead camera, resulting in 766 2-s video clips. The proposed hybrid approach integrates Mask Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (Mask R-CNN) instance segmentation with a binary classifier. To evaluate the model's performance under varying data conditions, the dataset was divided into training, validation, and testing sets using three data grouping scenarios: by frame, by clip, and by day. Results: Among the five evaluated binary classification algorithms, Support Vector Machine (SVM) was selected based on its superior performance. The hybrid system achieved a balanced accuracy and F1-score of 95% with the clip-based split, rising to 99% with the frame-based split and falling to 74% with the day-based split. Discussion: Under pilot conditions, the system offers a feasible proof-of-concept for continuous monitoring of mounting behaviour in group-housed pigs, operating at a processing rate of five frames per second. This capability offers strong potential for supporting early intervention and proactive welfare management, subject to future multi-site validation. Moving forward, future research will focus on integrating individual animal tracking and conducting larger-scale studies to further explore the system's scalability and enhance its performance.

Indexed as

boarsclassificationcomputer visiondeep learningmountingsegmentationswine

Identifiers

PMID42761533
PMCPMC13587698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.