ArticleBrain & spine2026
Impact of cervical full-endoscopic spine surgery on intracranial pressure in swine.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cervical full-endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) has grown in clinical use, but the effects of irrigation on intracranial pressure (ICP) remain poorly understood and may pose neurological risks. Research question: Whether cervical FESS induces relevant ICP increases compared with prior lumbar data, under different irrigation parameters, drainage occlusion states, and anesthesia depths. Material and methods: In a controlled swine model, four female Results: Baseline ICP averaged 11.1 mmHg. Cervical FESS produced marked ICP increases, particularly during partial and total drainage obstruction, with peaks up to 102 mmHg. Under open drainage, ICP ranged from 7.9 to 29.1 mmHg, occasionally exceeding the 20 mmHg safety threshold but remaining lower than during occlusion. With anesthesia-depth modulation, mild sedation yielded occlusion peaks up to 62.5 mmHg, whereas deeper anesthesia was associated with open-drainage ICP of 9.5-19.7 mmHg and occlusion peaks of 23-36.6 mmHg. Discussion and conclusion: Cervical FESS was associated with earlier and more pronounced ICP elevations than lumbar procedures. Saline outflow occlusion is the primary trigger of critical pressure surges, while pump parameters modulate magnitude. Deeper anesthesia was associated with attenuated ICP responses. Maintaining drainage patency, using the lowest effective pump settings, and appropriate anesthetic management may reduce the risk of critical intracranial hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.