Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42761516›Full record

ArticleAJPM focus2026

Colorectal Cancer Screening Compliance Among Sexual Minority Subpopulations After the 2021 Updated U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Guidelines: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Laggy George, Rachel Liu-Galvin, Young-Rock Hong, Zhigang Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJPM focus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laggy GeorgeDepartment of Public Health, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, Florida.
Rachel Liu-GalvinDepartment of Health Services Research, Management, and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Young-Rock HongDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Zhigang XieDepartment of Health Services Research, Management, and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force updated its colorectal cancer screening guidelines in 2021; however, little is known about adherence to these updated guidelines among sexual minority populations. Methods: Using data from the 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, this study analyzed the adjusted prevalence ratios of up-to-date colorectal cancer screening across sexual orientation groups (straight, gay/lesbian, bisexual, and another sexual orientation [defined as something else]) using modified Poisson regression with robust variance estimation adjusted for sociodemographic factors. Analyses were further stratified by age group (45-49, 50-64, and 65-75 years) and sex. Results: The study included 173,381 respondents (weighted N=93,061,050) aged 45-75 years. Overall, the prevalence of up-to-date colorectal cancer screening ranged from 58.4% (another sexual orientation), 62.7% (bisexual), and 68.8% (straight) to 69.0% among gay/lesbian individuals ( Conclusions: Colorectal cancer screening among individuals with another sexual orientation consistently had a lower prevalence of up-to-date colorectal cancer screening than among straight and gay/lesbian individuals and did not differ significantly from that for gay/lesbian or bisexual individuals. This disparity was primarily driven by females and those aged 65-75 years, highlighting the need for age- and sex-tailored interventions.

Indexed as

cancer screeningColorectal cancerguidelinessexual minority subpopulationssexual orientation

Identifiers

PMID42761516
PMCPMC13586719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.