Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42761512›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genome editing2026

Rewriting the genome: harnessing R2 retrotransposons for precise DNA insertion.

Liangzheng Fu, Yachao Wu, Xiaohua Jin, Xu Ma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genome editing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Liangzheng FuNational Human Genetic Resources Center, Beijing, China.
Yachao WuState Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiaohua JinNational Human Genetic Resources Center, Beijing, China.
Xu MaNational Human Genetic Resources Center, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-based genome editors are fundamentally limited by their requirement for double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs), restricted transgene cargo capacity, and reliance on error-prone endogenous DNA repair mechanisms. Non-long terminal repeat (non-LTR) retrotransposons-especially the site-specific R2 element-offer a mechanistically distinct and potentially safer choice for programmable genomic integration. These elements employ target-primed reverse transcription (TPRT)-an RNA-templated integration mechanism that circumvents DSB formation and supports amplification of self-copy. This review delineates the molecular mechanism of R2 retrotransposons, emphasizing their highly specific integration into the 28 S ribosomal DNA locus-a recognized genomic safe harbor. We describe the functional domains of the R2 protein, including the reverse transcriptase, restriction-like endonuclease, and nucleic acid-binding motifs, and explain how they coordinate to achieve precise DNA cleavage and cDNA synthesis. Recent cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures have revealed discrete RNA-protein complex that orchestrate the stepwise progression of TPRT. Informed by these mechanistic insights, researchers have engineered programmable platforms-including PRINT and STITCHR-that enable RNA-directed transgene integration in mammalian systems. These platforms establish R2 as a viable all-RNA programmable system for targeted genomic integration. Future directions include reprogramming the DNA-binding specificity of R2 through protein engineering to target loci, optimizing integration fidelity and efficiency, and mining diverse R2-like elements from metagenomic data. With continued optimization and rigorous safety validation, R2-derived platforms could supplant current nuclease-dependent editors in applications requiring high-fidelity, large-cargo integration.

Indexed as

engineeringgene editingnon-LTR retrotransposonsR2 retrotransposonTPRT mechanism

Identifiers

PMID42761512
PMCPMC13586686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.