Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42761497›Full record

ReviewBrain & spine2026

Surgery for craniocervical instability and spinal cord compression in children with Mucopolysaccharidosis type IV: A systematic review.

A Peene, B Depreitere

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A PeeneNeurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
B DepreitereNeurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Mucopolysaccharidosis type IV (MPS IV) often leads to instability and spinal cord compression at the craniocervical junction in children, confronting surgeons with technical challenges associated with young age. Research question: This systematic review examines the effects of age at surgery and type of fixation on achieving craniocervical bony fusion and the impact of decompression and solid fusion on neurological outcomes. Material and methods: We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library for cohorts reporting on 'Craniocervical instability', 'Spinal cord compression' and 'Mucopolysaccharidosis type IV' up till April 27, 2024. Inclusion criteria were MPS IV, craniocervical instability treatment and age ≤ 16 years. Results: Eighteen studies were included, comprising 114 patients with a median age at surgery of 72.0 months (range: 17.0-191.0). A total of 88.6% (n = 101/114) of patients underwent craniocervical junction surgery, with rigid fixation used in 17.8% (n = 13/73) and decompression performed in 63.8% (n = 44/69) of cases. Craniocervical bony fusion was achieved in 93.8% (n = 91/97) of patients. Rigid fixation was less often used in children younger than three years (20.0%, n = 2/10), but fusion rate remained as high as 77.8% (n = 7/9). No statistically significant association between fixation type and bony fusion was detected (OR = 2.44, 95% CI 0.24-330.60, p = 0.51). There was a trend for neurological outcome to be better after performing decompression (OR = 4.48, 95% CI 0.87-23.26, p = 0.07). Discussion and conclusion: Although rigid fixation was less often applied in children below the age of three, fusion and neurological outcomes were reasonably favorable. There was a trend toward better neurological outcome in patients undergoing decompression.

Indexed as

Craniocervical instabilityMucopolysaccharidosis type IVOccipitocervical fusionRigid fixationSemi-rigid fixationSpinal Cord CompressionSpinal cord decompression

Identifiers

PMID42761497
PMCPMC13587715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.