Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42761473›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in systems biology2026

From biological surfaces to engineered systems: how synthetic and systems biology enable biomimetic design.

Btisème Bendjebour, Clément Iriart, Mathumitha Jeevakumar, William Potié, Lison Salin, Sébastien Urien, Johan Habersetzer, Urielle M'Be, Sophie Mothré, Pierre-Antoine Vigneron and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in systems biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Btisème Bendjebour *Graduate Program in Biotechnology Engineering, SupBiotech, Villejuif, France.
Clément Iriart *Graduate Program in Biotechnology Engineering, SupBiotech, Villejuif, France.
Mathumitha Jeevakumar *Bachelor's Program in Biotechnology Engineering, SupBiotech, Villejuif, France.
William Potié *Graduate Program in Biotechnology Engineering, SupBiotech, Villejuif, France.
Lison Salin *Graduate Program in Biotechnology Engineering, SupBiotech, Villejuif, France.
Sébastien Urien *Graduate Program in Biotechnology Engineering, SupBiotech, Villejuif, France.
Johan Habersetzer *Cellule pour la Valorisation de la Recherche Étudiante, SupBiotech, Villejuif, France.
Urielle M'Be *Cellule pour la Valorisation de la Recherche Étudiante, SupBiotech, Villejuif, France.
Sophie Mothré *Cellule pour la Valorisation de la Recherche Étudiante, SupBiotech, Villejuif, France.
Pierre-Antoine Vigneron *Cellule pour la Valorisation de la Recherche Étudiante, SupBiotech, Villejuif, France.
Julien GrimaudCellule pour la Valorisation de la Recherche Étudiante, SupBiotech, Villejuif, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological surfaces perform a wide range of functions, including communication, molecular exchange, defense, and movement. While these architectures have long inspired biomimetic surface engineering, most existing reviews focus on fabrication methods, often overlooking the biological mechanisms underlying the functions. This review examines how the structural and functional properties of biological surfaces can inform the design of advanced biomimetic systems. Using an integrative framework combining systems and synthetic biology, we establish key design principles derived from biological surfaces and illustrate their translation into engineered systems. Communication mechanisms such as directional reflection and electrochemical signaling, along with exchange processes like aquaporins or vesicle-based delivery, have informed advances in sensing, filtration, and drug delivery. Similarly, defensive strategies, including adaptive camouflage and antimicrobial surface architectures, offer opportunities for protective and responsive designs. In the context of movement, drag-reducing and adhesive surfaces have enabled innovations in robotics, smart textiles, and transport technologies. Systems biology provides quantitative, multiscale models of pattern formation, surface-mediated signaling, and organism-environment interactions, allowing the identification of key design rules. Complementarily, synthetic biology enables the engineering of living cells, tissues, and biohybrid systems capable of producing tailored surface chemistries, multiscale micro-nano architectures, and dynamic or stimuli-responsive behaviors inspired by laboratory observations. By synthesizing principles underlying surface-mediated communication, exchange, defense, and movement, this review outlines how integrating biological insight with systems-level modeling and synthetic engineering can redefine the next-generation of biomimetic designs.

Indexed as

adaptive materialsbioinspired designbioinspired engineeringbiological surfacesbiomimicrysynthetic biologysystems biology

Identifiers

PMID42761473
PMCPMC13587350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.