Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42761389›Full record

ArticleClinical parkinsonism & related disorders2026

Survival benefit of enteral nutrition and airway interventions in multiple system atrophy.

Katsuya Nishida, Kento Sakashita, Naonobu Futamura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katsuya NishidaDepartment of Neurology, National Hospital Organization Hyogo Chuo National Hospital, 1314 Ohara, Sanda, Hyogo 669-1592, Japan.
Kento SakashitaDepartment of Neurology, National Hospital Organization Hyogo Chuo National Hospital, 1314 Ohara, Sanda, Hyogo 669-1592, Japan.
Naonobu FutamuraDepartment of Neurology, National Hospital Organization Hyogo Chuo National Hospital, 1314 Ohara, Sanda, Hyogo 669-1592, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Dysphagia in multiple system atrophy (MSA) leads to pneumonia and malnutrition, impacting survival. This study evaluated the association between enteral nutrition (EN) and survival and described outcomes of laryngotracheal separation (LTS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 158 patients with probable/definite MSA (2000-2025). Survival from onset was evaluated using Simon-Makuch curves, Mantel-Byar tests with time-dependent EN, and Kaplan-Meier analysis with propensity score matching (PSM) and restricted mean survival time (RMST). Competing risk analyses (Fine-Gray models) assessed the cumulative incidence of death and respiratory interventions (tracheostomy or tracheostomy invasive ventilation [TIV]). Clinical outcomes of LTS ( Results: Eighty-seven patients received EN; median survival after EN initiation was 4.3 years. Simon-Makuch analysis showed lower survival in the EN group, reflecting late-stage introduction. After PSM, EN was associated with a modest survival advantage at 7 years (RMST difference 0.68 years, Conclusion: EN was independently associated with a statistically significant but clinically modest survival advantage, largely by facilitating a comprehensive care pathway including respiratory management. In a small LTS series, the prevention of pneumonia-related death and potential quality-of-life benefits support early structured advance care planning in advanced MSA.

Indexed as

Advance care planningDysphagiaEnteral nutritionLaryngotracheal separationMultiple system atrophySurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID42761389
PMCPMC13587071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.