ReviewHealth science reports2026
Necrotizing Fasciitis Outcomes in Diabetic vs Non-Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rapidly progressive, life-threatening infection, with the lower limbs being a common site. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a significant risk factor that influences the progression, outcome, and management of NF. Despite its clinical relevance, comparative data on diabetic versus non-diabetic NF outcomes remain limited. This study aimed to compare mortality, amputation rates, and other key outcomes between diabetic and non-diabetic patients with NF. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies assessed outcomes in diabetic and non-diabetic NF patients. Primary outcome measures included amputation rates, mortality, admission length, debridement frequency, and microbial growth. Secondary outcomes included the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score and unplanned reoperations. Pooled analyses were performed using OpenMeta[Analyst] software, reporting odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Nine studies comprising 1,890 patients met the inclusion criteria. Diabetic patients had significantly higher rates of amputation (OR 3.77, 95% CI 3.04 to 4.68; Conclusion: Diabetic patients with NF experience worse clinical outcomes, including increased amputation, mortality, and polymicrobial infection. These findings highlight DM as a key prognostic factor and underscore necessity for aggressive intervention and risk stratification. Further high-quality prospective studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.