ReviewExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy2026
Post-CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: expanding options and persisting uncertainties.
Review in Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endocrine treatment in combination with CDK4/6 inhibitors represents the mainstay of first-line palliative treatment in HR+/HER2- breast cancer. The treatment landscape after progression on CDK4/6 inhibitors has evolved into a complex and rapidly evolving field, driven by novel endocrine and targeted agents, new combination therapies, and increasing implementation of biomarker-directed approaches. Recent randomized trials have shown that new therapeutic strategies significantly prolong progression-free survival in this setting, with some treatments reaching notable numerical improvements. Translating these options into routine clinical practice remains challenging due to heterogeneous trial designs, lack of head-to-head comparisons, suboptimal comparator treatments, and limited overall survival data. While the increasing implementation of biomarkers holds the potential for more personalized treatments, their clinical utility depends on their mechanistic and contextual biological relevance, methodological reliability of detection, and proven predictive value in clinical trials. Based on the current evidence, optimal treatment selection and sequencing in the post-CDK4/6 inhibitor setting remain insufficiently defined, and optimization of biomarker-guided treatment requires further mechanistic understanding and methodological refinement. This narrative review provides an overview of the most recent randomized clinical trial evidence shaping current clinical practice and discusses persistent uncertainties regarding its implementation in routine care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.