ReviewSurgery open science2026
Barriers and facilitators to implementing Women in Surgery initiatives at UK medical schools: A qualitative study.
Review in Surgery open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite women comprising over half of UK medical school graduates, they represent only 17% of consultant surgeons. This imbalance limits female students' access to mentorship and career opportunities. Specialised Women in Surgery (WinS) programs at medical schools are key initiatives to address this imbalance and support aspiring female surgeons. Methods: This cross-sectional qualitative study surveyed 24 UK medical schools through semi-structured interviews with 53 representatives between October and December 2024. Data collection employed a mixed-method approach using open-ended and Likert scale questions (1-5), followed by thematic and quantitative analyses. Results: Of 24 participating UK medical schools, only 10 (41.7%) had an active or developing WinS initiative. Institutions with WinS programs reported higher engagement in gender equity and greater student awareness. The value of WinS was rated highly (4.5/5), with strong student demand (83.3%). The most significant barriers were high workload and lack of student time (mean rating: 3.33), funding constraints (mean rating: 3.01), and insufficient access to female surgeons (mean rating: 2.86). A key divergence emerged where universities without WinS programs struggled most with accessing female surgeons, while those with WinS programs identified funding as their main challenge. Conclusion: With only 41.7% of UK medical schools having established WinS initiatives, there is a critical need for coordinated national support. A framework providing shared resources and networking opportunities could transform isolated programs into an effective support system. These findings offer actionable recommendations to address inequities and empower future female surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.